Efficient Dispute Resolution, Backed by Institutional Integrity.

An institutional arbitration is one that is administered by an institution agreed upon by the parties and conducted in accordance with that institution’s arbitration rules. Generally, the arbitral institution’s role in an institutional arbitration includes (but is not limited to): receiving the request for arbitration and distributing it to the respondent; appointing the tribunal where the arbitration agreement provides for them to do so or in default of the parties’ ability to do so; setting and administering the financial arrangements for the arbitration (Eg.: setting a deposit or an advance on fees, and paying the tribunal’s fees); assisting the tribunal to deal with any issues that arise relating to the conduct of the arbitration (Eg.: a challenge to a tribunal member). Institutional arbitration has several advantages over ad-hoc arbitration, such as providing procedural rules for conduct of the arbitration, assistance with the appointment of arbitrators, and general administrative assistance.

Indian parties are increasingly opting for institutional arbitration to resolve their disputes. Arbitration may be defined as a process in which two or more parties settle their disputes as to their legal rights and liabilities by referring the dispute to a particular person (arbitrator), who decide the dispute with a binding effect and by applying the law, instead of the parties going to the Court of law. Arbitration is an alternative process of solving disputes, and hence, it coexists with the system of litigation.

The main objective of having an arbitration proceeding is to solve the dispute as fast as possible, which also has a binding effect, without going to the Court of law and getting engaged in the long-drawn judicial procedure. In India, the alternative method of solving disputes have been present from a long time, since trade and commerce started to grow outside the country.

What is Institutional Arbitration?

Institutional arbitration is a structured and legally recognised mechanism of alternative dispute resolution wherein arbitral proceedings are administered and supervised by a designated arbitration institution in accordance with its pre-established rules, procedures, and administrative framework. Upon the parties’ agreement to arbitrate under the auspices of an institution, the conduct of the arbitration—including case management, appointment of arbitrators, procedural timelines, and administrative oversight—is governed by the institution’s institutional rules, subject to the applicable arbitration law.Unlike ad hoc arbitration, where parties independently determine procedural aspects and manage the arbitration without external administrative support, institutional arbitration offers a regulated, predictable, and professionally managed process. The arbitral institution plays a neutral and facilitative role, ensuring procedural compliance, maintaining consistency, and providing logistical and administrative infrastructure essential for the effective conduct of proceedings.

Institutional arbitration enhances legal certainty by offering well-defined procedural rules, vetted panels of qualified and independent arbitrators, and established mechanisms for addressing procedural challenges such as arbitrator appointments, substitutions, fee determination, and interim measures. This institutional oversight minimises the risk of procedural deadlock, jurisdictional uncertainty, and enforceability challenges that may arise in unstructured arbitral processes.Further, institutional arbitration promotes efficiency, transparency, and fairness by imposing clear timelines, ethical standards, and due process safeguards, while also enabling cost predictability and effective case management. With the integration of technology and Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) systems, institutional arbitration has evolved to offer expedited, secure, and geographically neutral dispute resolution, making it particularly suited for contemporary commercial and cross-border disputes.In essence, institutional arbitration represents a disciplined and reliable dispute resolution framework that balances party autonomy with institutional expertise—ensuring that disputes are resolved in a manner that is legally sound, procedurally efficient, and capable of producing final and enforceable arbitral awards.

Request a Consultation

Why Choose Institutional Arbitration at SYSCO180?

Structured, transparent, and professionally managed — ensuring swift, fair, and enforceable dispute resolution every time.

Request a Consultation

Confidentiality

We understand the importance of confidentiality in dispute resolution. Our procedures are designed to protect the privacy of the parties and the confidentiality of the proceedings.

Expertise and Experience

Our panel of arbitrators comprises seasoned professionals with extensive experience in various sectors and legal systems. This ensures that your dispute is handled with the highest level of expertise and understanding.

Structured Process

SYSCO180 provides a well-defined framework for arbitration, from the initiation of proceedings to the final award. Our rules and procedures. are designed to facilitate a fair, transparent, and efficient resolution of disputes.

Administrative Support

We offer comprehensive administrative support, managing all logistical aspects of the arbitration process. This allows parties to focus on the substantive issues of their dispute without being burdened by procedural complexities.

Neutral and Impartial

As a neutral institution, SYSCO180 ensures Impartiality in the arbitration process. Our commitment to fairness and justice underpins every aspect of our operations.

Institutional Arbitration Process

Following Steps to resolve a dispute

File a new dispute.

Select intermediary against whom you wish to file a dispute.

Select Category

Enter Dispute details

Payment of fees online

Track resolution process on SYSCO180 Timeline.

List of Arbitrators

Retired Judges

Sushil Kumar Goyal, (Retd.) District & Sessions Judge

Senior Advocates

Mr. Kishor V Kotwal, Sr. Advocate

Bombay High Court

Mrs. Vidya K Kotwal, Sr. Advocate

Bombay High Court

Mr. Niraj Kumar, Sr. Advocate

Bombay High Court

Mr. Mukund Kumar Singh, Sr. Advocate

Bombay High Court

Mr. Amit Tanvar, Sr. Advocate

Bombay High Court

Former Police Officer:

Mr. Manoj M Pawar, (Retd.) Police Officer

Domestic & International Arbitration

SYSCO180 offers a comprehensive and institutionally governed framework for both domestic and international arbitration, catering to the evolving dispute resolution needs of individuals, businesses, and institutions operating within and across jurisdictions. By combining legal expertise, procedural discipline, and technology-enabled administration, SYSCO180 ensures that arbitral proceedings are efficient, impartial, and legally enforceable, regardless of the nature or geographical scope of the dispute.

Domestic Arbitration

Domestic arbitration administered by SYSCO180 addresses disputes where the parties, subject matter, and seat of arbitration fall within the same jurisdiction. Such proceedings are conducted in strict compliance with the applicable national arbitration law and institutional rules, ensuring adherence to due process, neutrality, and statutory timelines. SYSCO180 provides end-to-end administrative support, including appointment of qualified arbitrators, case management, procedural scheduling, and delivery of reasoned awards. The institution’s structured framework ensures predictability, cost-efficiency, and enforceability equivalent to a court decree, while significantly reducing delays and procedural complexities.